Home › Forums › Climbing Talk › CALM Regulations 2002
People might be interested to know that a contravention of reg 37(2) of the CALM Regulations 2002 attracts a $2000 (max) penalty.
(see page 20)
Whilst the advice DEC received from the SSO on the construction of reg 37(2) as it applies to bolting and chipping is simply advice, it seems clear that it is correct, and that reg 37(2) encompasses bolting and chipping. Irrespective of any code of conduct developed by CAWA in cooperation with DEC, bolters would still be taking a risk.
Although I can’t say i’d be worried if I were to bolt a route on DEC land.
Does anyone know if there is any CAWA policy on chipping in quarries, or any in the pipeline?
Hello good people, I am willing to go in and bat for you all if you will vote for me in the next election. I can also come climbing with you all and I do really great party jokes and will sniff and seat that a girl sits on.
And I did forget to advise all the ladys that if you require any assistance in taking off your bras I can help there also.
Yes, hello there fellow climbing friends.
I too can assist for the approriate fee.
Hi Owen, also a big ‘Hi’ to our friends Troy and Brian.
Firstly Troy, don’t let all the bad publicity get you down – just keep your nose to the grindstone, or at least the seat.
Seriously however, as a CAWA committee member, I can’t speak for the committee, but I think that the general opinion is that chipping in not on, particularly on natural rock such as at Churchmans.
However there are many issues that need to be dealt with here and perhaps the main one is that ‘chipping’ needs to be officially defined first.
By this I mean that there are various shades of grey. Personally I see no issue with someone ‘cleaning’ a route of choss. Last year I saw a couple of well known WA climbers at West Cape Howe trundling TV-sided boulders and I had no problems with that as they were simply cleaning up loose rubble that was an accident waiting to happen.
On the other hand, adding in completely new hand-hold on an otherwise flat slab is another matter.
I think one way of defining ‘chipping’ is if it significantly changes the character of the rock, then it is chipping.
Anyway, food for thought.
Hello Brian, can you help me ?
Hello there Troy, If I can be of assistance to you just let me know. Is it chair rental you are looking for or possibly some new material for your chairs at work ? We have chair cam available for you
Hi also to Paul and Brian.
I would remind everyone that as a government entity, CALM (department of Conservation and Land Management) NO LONGER EXISTS. This department was revised and replaced by DEC with Western Australian goverment restructuring in late 2005 to early 2006.
The new name is the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) WA.
I question whether the 2002 CALM Regulations are still legally effective (i.e. whether these regulations have been superceded – I can’t readily find evidence of this).
DEC management plans tend to refer to adopting CAWA’s code of conduct in relation to bolting and Adventure Climbing Zones, and the requirement that all climbers follow this code of conduct (whether a CAWA member or not). They are a bit dated though…particularly in relation to issues raised in the draft Cape Range Managment Plan as well as the proposed Adventurous Activities Standards (AAS) through Outdoors WA.
Also worth pointing out is that DEC is the government agency reponsible for managing ‘publicly’ owned lands and waters[including seas] (Crown and listed reserves/parks). While some DEC staff and policies/regulations may allude to direct ownership of areas such as quarries, the reality is that it is done on behalf of all Austrlians.
DEC manage for environmentally sensisitive areas, conservation of ecosystems/landscapes and biodiversity, as well as social values within these areas (including indigenous/cultural heritage). Their responsibility also includes advising on disturbances to natural areas, the greyness comes in with disturbed natural areas like quarries.
Conrad, the name change of the department will not affect the validity of the regulations.
There is really no question of DEC’s authority to regulate the quarries. It’s probably in our best interests to consider our inferior bargaining position when attempting to negotiate with DEC