Grading the climb…

Home Forums Climbing Talk Grading the climb…

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 53 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2779 Reply
    Mark

      Should it be for the onsight? Of course it should.

      I have spoken with a few of Perth’s “hardmen” and questioned their thoughts on if a climb should be graded for the onsight or the redpoint. I am puzzled with their response that a climb should be graded for the redpoint. Now this may be the case if you have worked and then climbed a route to death, as your body becomes used to the moves, you become fitter and the climb become wired, you know the rests, you now the best body position etc… But for those that attempt a climb as an onsight, (which I feel is the most satisfying send) should it still not be graded for the onsight?

      #2780 Reply
      Logan

        I agree with those so called “hardmen”. A route should be graded for the redpoint. Many times someone works up to a grade until they tick the route or boulder problem. At this stage they are fitter and stronger and climbing the grade. The holds have not got any bigger, no magic rests have appeared. The fact that they have knowledge of the route helps them but the fact they have the potential to climb that grade is there. Onsighting simply means you have the potential to climb several grades harder if you had the patience to put in the time and effort to work a route. Onsighting is a good feeling but not as good as ticking a route above your limit that you have put time and effort into, a route that becomes personal.

        #2781 Reply
        Emil

          I feel that grading a route is a “complex decision-making matrix” that is not as simple as calling it an onsight or even red-point grade. I am willing to argue though.

          The point I would like to make with Mark is if what he says is true I will concede that “Fun, Love and Joy” at Wallcliff is 23 to onsight (but certainly not 24).

          #2782 Reply
          Anon

            It’s about time we get some consitancy in grades of around WA. Looking at 24’s…

            Heavy Petting – Kalbarri

            Fuck the law – Kalbarri

            Fun love and Joy – Wallclife

            Hang Ten – Mt Quarry

            Heavy Metal – Willy

            Turbo Crack – Hardy Rd

            There is at least 2 grade differences between some of these… What are the thoughts of a blanket regrading of WA climbs to get them in perspective not only with the rest of WA but the rest of Australia?

            #2783 Reply
            Anon 2

              Gotta disagree with you Logan (and no disrespect)- you’re not ‘fitter and stronger’ when you finally manage to redpoint a project- you’ve just memorised the moves! There is a concept known as muscle memory and that is what has happened.

              I’d much rather climbs be graded at the level they are when onsighting (cos I hate working things as projects!) but as long as we’re consistent I don’t really mind!

              #2784 Reply
              Emil

                Ooooh, I love this subject. Here’s what i think:

                Heavy Petting – Kalbarri – 22

                Fuck the law – Kalbarri – (no comment havnt done it for ages)

                Fun love and Joy – Wallclife – 22/23

                Hang Ten – Mt Quarry – 23

                Heavy Metal – Willys – 23

                Turbo Crack – Hardy Rd – 24 if your fingers are less than 1.5cm in girth, 25 if greater.

                Thrutching the Bison – Kalbarri – 22

                Kyle – Wallcliff – 21

                Llama arete – Hardy Rd – Solid 23 esp O/S

                #2785 Reply
                Mark

                  Geeze Emil bit harsh there. Killing a few people’s first grade 24 lead and suggesting it maybe only 22? (ref – fun love and joy).

                  While we are at it… Chain reaction needs a few grades chopped as well.

                  And what would you grade the 23 (Belt Fed)you struggled on at Pinjarra?

                  #2786 Reply
                  Logan

                    Dear Anon2. Rather than training in a gym all the time (which does help you improve) it is possible to get on routes which are above your level and by working them improve your grip strength, body tension and technique. I am well aware of muscle memory which does play a part in a redpoint of a worked route and also in training such as the few who do laps on cardiofunk at Mt Quarry. This is a grade 29 which is easily lapped by those that do not onsight 29 but the training with the use of muscle memory is great for power endurance. From my experience you are definetely fitter and stronger when you finally get the route.

                    As for Emils grading – Very Harsh – but maybe this critcism is what some routes need.

                    #2787 Reply
                    ben

                      I stopped caring about grades a while ago. The less I care about grades the more I enjoy climbing and the better I climb. I think that’s irony.

                      Next time you go climbing cross out the grades in the guidebook and just think about how much you enjoyed the climb. The grade is no measure of the quality of the climb or the person who climbs it. OOOh.

                      #2788 Reply
                      Neil

                        I agree with Emil – the grade depends on a bit more than whether its an onsight or a redpoint, but in general grading based on a redpoint is correct IMO.

                        Heavy Petting – 22

                        Fuck the law – easy 25

                        Fun love and Joy – Wallclife – 23

                        Hang Ten – Mt Quarry – 24

                        Heavy Metal – straightforward 24

                        Turbo Crack – hard 24.

                        Thrutching the Bison – 22

                        Kyle – 21ish

                        Llama arete – Solid 23

                        These kind of issues make climbing so interesting. If all gr23’s felt the same then that would take a fair bit of the attraction away from climbing. Likewise, different climbers will all have different opinons wrt what grade it is. The actual grade the climb is given should be a rough concensus of this.

                        #2789 Reply
                        Emil

                          ok, ok I could go to 23 for FL+J but that’s my final offer. And Mark, the reason that it is folks’ first 24 is because it’s really 23!As for your salacious comment about that contrivance at Pinjarra, you’re right, maybe after it’s finished exfoliating, it may be worth climbing. Ha Ha

                          #2790 Reply
                          Jamie

                            A grade is based on a general concensus that a climbis of a similar difficulty of another climb in a similar style.

                            Personally grades can be used as a benchmark for personal growth and achievement…to measure progress and also as a guide….if for example you climb grade 20 you can walk up to other grade 20 climbs and should have a fair amount of sucess.

                            As far as grading for redpoint or onsight…does it really matter…it doesnt change the difficulty of the climb…it only shows the appreximate relation of the difficulty of that climb in relation to other climb of a similar grade..whether the climb is graded 22 or 24 the difficulty of that particular climb wont change.

                            One final note there will always be differing opinions of how difficult a climb is and give or take a grade or two its really academic…depending on the style of the climb (slab, face, overhang, crack) and how you are performing on the day you may find a climb harder or easier or about right to the given grade.

                            So just leave it alone or if a climb is way out adjust it by common consensus.

                            #2791 Reply
                            Glenn

                              Greetings All:

                              My understanding is the Ewbank grading system was defined for the “onsight leader”. If you are using any other definition you are not using the australian grading system.

                              The system was designed to take into account gear placement, route (and hold) finding, and fear factors.

                              I dont see how anyone can seriously argue that climbs dont get easier after on multiple attempts?

                              #2792 Reply
                              Neil

                                What about White Witches on the Cross at Peak Head ? (c/w vulcan grip!)

                                I wonder if anyone has onsighted Llama Arete….. That climb has also benefited from a fair bit of ethic sculpting. However, without the glue and sculpting the climb wouldn’t be there….

                                I’m pretty sure Ewbank is the redpoint grade. Onsight is too variable and too dependant on how you do the moves.

                                #2793 Reply
                                Mark

                                  One of Perth’s “hardmen” OS Larma Arete 2 weeks ago. A very solid lead.

                                  As to Emils comments about Pinjarra — Dry your eyes…

                                  #2794 Reply
                                  Emil

                                    I think i had something in my eye. must have been the hellacious bush-bash.

                                    #2795 Reply
                                    Toc

                                      I wondered if I should even comment on this, but anyway here goes. Every one of the small number of climbs I’ve put up has been a natural onsight, and only one of them have I repeated. Every grade I gave was subject to revision from further ascents from other people particularly the seconder who probably was in a better position to have a clearer think about it than me.

                                      From a grading point of view does it matter if you onsite or redpoint? “All”? a redpoint means is you’ve practised the climb, but the degree of difficulty of the climb doesn’t vary. So maybe when grading from an onsite perspective you need to sit back, think about it and try and remove from your thoughts how much more difficult it was because you didn’t know what the hell was coming up next. So grading from a redpoint perspective doesn’t make the climb itself, harder or easier, but hopefully will produce a more accurate grade. Anyway aren’t all grades provisional and waiting for a consensus from further ascents, at least initially?

                                      So I’d be happy to have open slather on West Australian grades, because some of them could probably be adjusted. (not that I can comment on the climbs you guys are talking about, because I don’t climb that hard)

                                      Cheers all.

                                      #2796 Reply
                                      Neil

                                        Did any of the “hardmen” who visted Llama Rock try the awkward crack left of Turbo Crack ? There are 20’s then there are 20’s !

                                        The project (belay bolts on top) on the smooth steep wall right of the chasm at Llama Rock has been top roped cleanly and is worth a go too.

                                        Also, the Fedayn at Connoisseur Rocks is worth a go if you can do laps on Turbo Crack.

                                        #2797 Reply
                                        Mark

                                          “Hardmen” of perth OS’ed the crack to the left of Turbo Crack. I am the first to admit, I was thoroughly spanked. Definitely a tough 20/21 – belt, braces and flannelette blue collar climbing.

                                          #2798 Reply
                                          Emil

                                            Neil – Do you happen to know if the RHS of the arete that is opposite the thin 18 slab at Llama has been done? There is a 17-18 slab/arete climb on the LHS of it, but the RHS has a thin crack and carrot bolt near the top. Havnt seen any mention of it anywhere. Looks like it would go mostly on gear and be 22-24ish.

                                            We top-roped the proj you mentioned clean although climbing the tree made us cry. The flake at the top creaked ominously….

                                            #2799 Reply
                                            Neil

                                              Hmmm. Not sure exactly what route you are refering too. I’d say it has been done if there is a bolt there. Although, it may have been done as an easier, indirect variant as I don’t remember any routes around the 22-24 mark.

                                              What do you think of Turbo Crack and Llama Arete ? I reckon they are 2 of the better routes on granite boulders near Perth. It’s a shame there weren’t a few more routes like these…. equaly so, pity the project line didn’t have a hold or 2 extra down low to make the tree free start a more reasonable grade :(.

                                              That reminds me – there is a nice route at Upper Darlington that’s also 1 hold short of being an instant classic. it has been done, but it’s very height dependant.

                                              #2800 Reply

                                              Here I am, sitting in Oman, 40C outside, so jelaous you guys are climbing. At least I can write…

                                              I put up some climbs around Perth, I always tried to grade for onsight but this is a hopeless task. Imagine this: I spot a line, rap it, clean it, bolt it, dog it, then get it. By then I know every hold and move pretty well. So now I try to step back and ask myself “how hard is this for someone who is not familiar with this?” So I tend to have a stab and then change opinion based on feed back. (I do try to climb any natural trad routes on sight.) Another thing is that I am 190 cm tall, weigh 88kg and have +3″ ape factor but also a weak grip (can’t boulder for shit). So how is the same route going to feel to someone who is 155cm, 50kg…etc. Here lies the problem.

                                              And not only that, climbs vary so much, I mean almost anyone can train up to a 24 Kalbarri route but a 24 granite slab (think Ron’s efforts at Mt Cuthbert). So the grading system accuracy is +/-1 grade even if the rock/cliff is similar (depending on who grades it) and comparing grades across granite and sandstone and dolomite and limestone and cracks and slabs and overhangs…..well, you see what I mean.

                                              To me the purpose of the grade is to tell the climber if this climb is for them, i.e. if you lead 18 then you don’t want to be on runout 24. The rest is detail, but still worth giving opinions. Grades do change and guidebooks get updated.

                                              I have climbed around the world and found that 24 is 5.11d and 7a, just like most guidebook tables say (not Shane’s guidebooks, the tables in those are hopeless). So Perth is not undergraded or requiring a blanket regrade. When I did the last Perth guidebook I asked people for comments on grades and anything and got maybe 20 comments, so there were no strong feelings about that then.

                                              End of lunch break. Enjoy climbing, lucky scumbags.

                                              Ross

                                              #2801 Reply
                                              Glenn

                                                Hi All:

                                                Somewhere in my pile of climbing junk I have Ewbanks original article on climbing grades – I might dig it out sometime….

                                                I am pretty sure the grading system was developed for an onsight leader (assumes absolutely no knowledge of the climb other than what you can see from the ground); the original system was ment to include all factors, including poor gear etc.

                                                I am sorry to say that this means many of you need to lower your claims by around 4 grades

                                                🙂

                                                either that or convert to the US system…

                                                #2802 Reply
                                                Emil

                                                  Nice one Ross, i agree 24 is 5.11d and 7a (depending on the area). Sorry to harp on about this one, but there is no way that FL+J or Heavy Metal would get 11d.

                                                  Seeing as though youre over there – have you climbed at Wadi Rum in Jordan yet?

                                                  #2803 Reply
                                                  Neil

                                                    Would you give Orestes 24 ?

                                                    Crawling from the Wreckage 23 ?

                                                    3rd pitch of Stranger in a Strange Land = 18 ??? (Nostromo ?)

                                                    so many more….. semantics really.

                                                    As ben said, it doesn’t really matter as long as you’re having fun.

                                                  Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 53 total)
                                                  Reply To: Grading the climb…
                                                  Your information: