Grading the climb…

Home Forums Climbing Talk Grading the climb…

  • This topic has 52 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 19 years ago by Ollie.
Viewing 3 posts - 51 through 53 (of 53 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2829 Reply
    Jon

      Di is a big evil bully girl who makes me boulder 🙂 (did I see u with a harness on the other night *gasps in horror*)

      though she can’t do my reachy dyno’y problems hee hee hee 🙂

      #2830 Reply
      Di

        Yeah yeah John but I only put my harness on under duress. And it probably took me many minutes to figure out how!

        See ya tonight.

        #2831 Reply
        Ollie

          In my opinion climbs should always been rated for on-sight as there are a lot of muli-pitch or alpine climbs where it’s just impossible to check out the route and memorize it. That’s why ppl usually indicate if they scored onsight or redpoint or even aided. Obviously you have to be able to score a higher graded red-point before you can on-sight the same grade. But this is part of the game as it is with protection. Again, this is not part of the grade but makes a lot of difference (traditional, heavily bolted). There are other factors like altitude, height, conditions which are not part of the grading system but which should be mentioned. I think the grade should always be as high as the hardest part of the pitch. You wouldn’t grade a consistent 20m high climb different from a 3m climb even if it’s much easier…

        Viewing 3 posts - 51 through 53 (of 53 total)
        Reply To: Grading the climb…
        Your information: